#Timekeeper cabarrus trial

It is her discharge that is the subject of this action.ДЈ. She was employed in that position until she was involuntarily discharged on or about April 30, 1981. On or about September 1, 1979, she was promoted to the job of administrative foreman in the Wet Finishing Office. On or about May 26, 1977, plaintiff was promoted to the position of chemical reports and records. On that date, plaintiff became a timekeeper in the same department. On or about March 25, 1971, she was transferred to the position of preference styles in the Bleachery Department until July 17, 1972. On or about January 1, 1968, plaintiff was employed as a gray room helper in *1148 the Bleachery Department. She voluntarily severed her employment with the company on Apand was reemployed on or about Septemas a shearing machine operator. On or about March 1, 1965, the plaintiff began work at Cannon as a learner hemmer. Cannon is in the business of producing textile products and is an employer as defined by 42 U.S.C. Defendant Cannon Mills Company (hereinafter Cannon) is a North Carolina corporation presently doing business in Cabarrus County and other counties in North Carolina. Plaintiff is a female citizen and resident of Rowan County, North Carolina. Defendant filed a reply brief on January 11, 1985, and plaintiff filed a response to the reply brief on January 30, 1985.ДЎ. Plaintiff filed her responses to the same on December 24, 1984. Defendant filed its post-trial brief, proposed findings of fact, and conclusions of law on November 27, 1984. The court entered an order on Octorequiring defendant to file post-trial documents on or before Novemand requiring plaintiff to respond on or before December 11, 1984. The transcript was filed on September 21, 1984.

#Timekeeper cabarrus trial

The court allowed the parties to file proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and trial briefs after they received copies of the trial transcript. The matter was tried before the court on April 18, 19, 24, 25, in Winston-Salem. Price filed this action on alleging that defendant Cannon Mills Company, in discharging her from her employment, discriminated against her because of her sex and in retaliation for her pursuing her rights under Title VII, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. Susan Hartzoge, Kannapolis, N.C., Wayne S. *1147 Jonathan Wallas, Charlotte, N.C., for plaintiff.